Wednesday, April 22, 2009
copyright video
So, working on the copyright video reminded me of how much I dislike time constraints when working on things such as videos. I hate having an idea that has to be cut down to fit. This time wasn't as bad as previous assignments I've had in video classes. The worst was probably a short film I had to make. The original script I had written for myself years ago was about 20 pages long. The video could only be up to eight minutes. So of course, I had to simplify and settle for a sub par short film that really didn't touch base on very much of anything that I had originally written. Technology wise, I didn't know if it was okay to use other tech so I stuck with the animoto. If I could've I would've used something else like FinalCut. Animoto is great but I think that they shouldn't count their animated logo as part of your 30 seconds. It takes up about 3 minutes of your video time which I think is a bit unfair.
Friday, April 17, 2009
Cheating and Technology
I agree with David Thornburg's statement, "ban questions for which technology provides instant answers." With the advancements in technology, information has become so easy to access that the current method of education is about to become obsolete, or atleast is should. Seeing as much of education today asks students to merely read, memorize, and retell, if information is so readily available there is no real learning happening if they can merely go online and look the information up at any moment.
By asking students to think critically rather than fill in blanks, students can still access the information but then also create a new individual and intimate connection to it. This would allow the information to stay with the students longer and in a more meaningful way.
In regards to copyright, by having students go to sources for papers or projects, students can have a better and closer relationship with copyright law. By using project-based learning, teachers can have students create projects that use materials under Creative Commons as well as using some within copyright law in order to fully understand what they can and cannot do with materials that are out there. It will also allow them to put together their own portfolios, using the copyright and Creative Commons guidelines, that they can use in their educational career.
I also think that by steering away from the traditional way of teaching, students will become better critical thinkers and problem solvers. As it is now, students are becoming critical thinkers and problem solvers in a negative way, by finding better ways to cheat. As seen with the many sites that give out research papers and other things such as that. I think that logical sources of information such as Cliff’s Notes, have taken a harsh hit and because of that, students feel that cheating is the way to go. If we label aides such as Cliff’s Notes and Spark Notes as unfair and cheat aides, then students will see cheat sites and paper sites as a possible source because if something that is legally sold in stores is cheating, then a site can’t be that much worse.
The main problem is that people have not truly taken the time to show students how to properly research and use the many sources that are out there for them in this day and age. In the past, it was simpler because the main sources out there were books, newspapers, magazines, and other print sources. Now, there are more through technology such as podcasts, wikis, blogs and other various online resources. The key is educating students in how to use these sources and how to think about what they are doing rather than going through the motions of education.
I really like David Thornburg’s idea of having students either write a paper or analyze the papers that are available online. This lets the students know that yes, the teacher knows about those sites, but there are still ways to decipher whether or not the student actually read the book or assignment. I think that in order to keep on top of cheating and copyright as well, teachers must adapt and become more creative in the ways they teach and impart information to the students they teach.
Overall, copyright is a very confusing thing that I believe can only be truly understood by actively working with it. Only reading the facts gives a superficial look at it, it isn't until you work the materials that real understanding begins.
By asking students to think critically rather than fill in blanks, students can still access the information but then also create a new individual and intimate connection to it. This would allow the information to stay with the students longer and in a more meaningful way.
In regards to copyright, by having students go to sources for papers or projects, students can have a better and closer relationship with copyright law. By using project-based learning, teachers can have students create projects that use materials under Creative Commons as well as using some within copyright law in order to fully understand what they can and cannot do with materials that are out there. It will also allow them to put together their own portfolios, using the copyright and Creative Commons guidelines, that they can use in their educational career.
I also think that by steering away from the traditional way of teaching, students will become better critical thinkers and problem solvers. As it is now, students are becoming critical thinkers and problem solvers in a negative way, by finding better ways to cheat. As seen with the many sites that give out research papers and other things such as that. I think that logical sources of information such as Cliff’s Notes, have taken a harsh hit and because of that, students feel that cheating is the way to go. If we label aides such as Cliff’s Notes and Spark Notes as unfair and cheat aides, then students will see cheat sites and paper sites as a possible source because if something that is legally sold in stores is cheating, then a site can’t be that much worse.
The main problem is that people have not truly taken the time to show students how to properly research and use the many sources that are out there for them in this day and age. In the past, it was simpler because the main sources out there were books, newspapers, magazines, and other print sources. Now, there are more through technology such as podcasts, wikis, blogs and other various online resources. The key is educating students in how to use these sources and how to think about what they are doing rather than going through the motions of education.
I really like David Thornburg’s idea of having students either write a paper or analyze the papers that are available online. This lets the students know that yes, the teacher knows about those sites, but there are still ways to decipher whether or not the student actually read the book or assignment. I think that in order to keep on top of cheating and copyright as well, teachers must adapt and become more creative in the ways they teach and impart information to the students they teach.
Overall, copyright is a very confusing thing that I believe can only be truly understood by actively working with it. Only reading the facts gives a superficial look at it, it isn't until you work the materials that real understanding begins.
Thursday, April 2, 2009
Blogs and Education
For my Senior Seminar class I have to spend 15 hours in a classroom. I was having trouble finding a class to work in. I wanted to pick a class that I would have no problem working in for that long of a time. Luckily, I went online and searched some school websites and stumbled upon this blog . After seeing it, I decided that this was the room I wanted to observe. I think that Mrs. Arreguin does a good job of keeping up with the technologies even though she is an older generation teacher. In her classroom she has six computer and even has a smart board.
She is trying to get something called a airliner working that allows her to work with the smart board from a little further away. I think it's great to have a smart board because so many of the kids jump at the chance to work with it.
photo by popofatticus.
She is trying to get something called a airliner working that allows her to work with the smart board from a little further away. I think it's great to have a smart board because so many of the kids jump at the chance to work with it.
photo by popofatticus.
Mobile Searching Moment
This past weekend my boyfriend and I were shopping for ingredients to cook some pasta. While we were there we realized that we didn't really know what two of the ingredients were. So, I took out my cell phone and texted "define arugula" and "define radicchio." Following the radicchio search, I had to look up chicory sense the definition was "a type of chicory." It actually helped us find what we needed. It also helped me win a debate between my boyfriend over the definition of "minced."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
